Share Send by emailPost to TwitterLike on FacebookDigg thisShare on Deliciousretweet

To Wait or Not to Wait??

Joyce Gottesfeld, MD | Ob/Gyn | Jul 15, 2011 | 2 Comments | Print

I think I have mentioned in previous blogs that I teach the “Human Development,” or HD, class at school-grades 4-8.  By the time I’m teaching the 8th graders, we are discussing everything.  There are many topics I wish I did not have to talk to 8th graders (13-year-olds!) about, but the reality is, information is out there, on the Internet, in the music they listen to, from their friends.  It's often not completely accurate and really kind of scary.  And, some kids will be becoming sexually active, even at that young age.  I wish I could say I have never delivered a baby of a 13-year-old mother, but I have, and that’s a tough situation.

 

When I teach the 8th graders, I really try to emphasize that they should wait to have sex until they are married, or at the very least in a stable, committed relationship with a house and a good job and a good income, and the means to care for a family.  But what I know is that the vast majority of kids do not wait for marriage.  And quite frankly, if a kid decides to wait to become sexually active until they are married, that is going to be a decision they make based on their own value system, not because their 8th grade HD teacher told them to wait.  Nonetheless, I feel its my obligation as a Gynecologist and mother to tell those kids to wait.

 

So, while trying to talk to the kids about the importance of waiting -- being emotionally and psychologically ready, staying safe from infections and unintended pregnancies -- I still want to make sure they have the facts, and know how to protect themselves.

 

Here is a scenario that I’d love to know what you think about:  One of my patients has a 17-year-old daughter.  The daughter is a very smart, serious girl.  She will, in all likelihood, be applying for and then attending a top-notch college, and going on to do great things.  She is about to start her senior year in high school.  She’s had a lot of stressors in her life, and finally, she met a sweet boy, who is kind to her and makes her very happy.  It's really her first serious boyfriend and now they have been dating about 4 or 5 months. 

 

She told her mother, my patient, that she had become sexually active.  Her mother told the dad their daughter now needed birth control.  This woman has been my patient for many years, and I met this daughter when she was just a toddler, so we are all just dropping our jaws that she has moved into this stage of life. 

 

But it seems to have occurred in really an optimal way -- this girl will now remember her first sexual experience fondly, she has been open with her parents and fully intends to take proper precautions (though accidents can happen...).  And it is hard to deny that she seems quite happy.  So, much as I hate to admit it (I do have 3 daughters after all), I really think this is probably ok.  Not all 17-year-olds are the same though.  Not all would be ready to take this step and really be able to handle it.  But this girl seems ready, and she’s being smart, as she always is.  

 

What do you think??

Comments

Please do not include any medical, personal or confidential information in your comment. Conversation is strongly encouraged; however, Kaiser Permanente reserves the right to moderate comments on this blog as necessary to prevent medical, personal and confidential information from being posted on this site. In addition, Kaiser Permanente will remove all spam, personal attacks, profanity, and off-topic commentary.
By submitting your comment, you are agreeing to the Privacy Policy above.
Thank you for your post Dr. Gottesfeld, I always enjoy reading these. The situation with the 17 year old sounds perfectly healthy to me. I think it's fantastic that the girl felt comfortable enough to speak to her mom about it, that alone shows a high level of maturity. From what I remember from highschool, it seemed many parents wanted to be there for their kids should they make a similar decision but still had rules like curfews, no people of the opposite sex over unsupervised, etc. that seems to send a conflicting message and even encouraging more dangerous behavior. Thoughts anyone?
Hi "Anonymous!" I think that does send a conflicting message. The curfew I think is still a good idea for many reasons, like not driving too late at night and parents not having to wait up too long. Lets not forget, teens can be "unsupervised" in their house when the parents are home. It would be nice to think your kids will make good decisions whether their parent is there or not, especially by 17. Soon they will be off to college and life on their own anyways. I guess you still have to put some guard rails up as a parent, it probably depends on the teen how high the rails have to be.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

Brought to you by:

Follow and Share

Subscribe to our newsletter